Skip to main content
WBF What is
brain fog?
Support WBF Take quiz

Test guide Screening tool

PHQ-9 Depression Test: Score Ranges and Results

PHQ-9 scores nine symptoms from the past two weeks. The total runs from 0 to 27. Save every answer, daily impact, and item 9 follow-up with the score.

9 items How often symptoms appeared during the previous 14 days 0 to 27 Each answer scores 0 to 3; keep the item pattern 10 A common screening point, followed by assessment Item 9 Follow up directly, separate from the total
01

What a PHQ-9 result can show

Depression symptoms can make it hard to think, work, study, eat, sleep, or care for yourself. PHQ-9 shows how often each symptom happened. The same total can come from different answers. Sleep problems, pain, grief, trauma, anxiety, bipolar symptoms, medicine, substances, anemia, thyroid disease, pregnancy, illness, and brain conditions can cause similar problems.

Time window

How often nine symptoms appeared in two weeks

The questions cover interest, mood, sleep, energy, appetite, self-worth, concentration, movement, and thoughts of death or self-harm.

Burden

Which symptoms carried the total

Two people can have the same score through different answers. Keep all nine answers and the separate daily-difficulty response.

Follow-up

Whether a fuller depression assessment is needed

A score of 10 often leads to a full review. A lower score still matters when one symptom, safety, or daily function is serious.

Limit

What the questionnaire does not decide

A clinician still checks the diagnosis, bipolar signs, psychosis, suicide risk, physical causes, and treatment choices.

Read the answers before the band

Read the total with every answer, daily difficulty, item 9 follow-up, safety, medicine, substances, sleep, physical health, and the full interview.

Save this test

Save it after item 9 and the score have been reviewed

Keep the nine answers, total, daily impact, safety action, health details, and follow-up plan together. This makes repeat scores easier to compare.

The saved form supports direct care. It does not contact emergency services.

02

Who needs a different PHQ-9 form or interpretation

Adult men and women use the same item scores. Age, language, pregnancy, illness, and access needs can change the form and follow-up.

Children age 11 or younger

USPSTF says there is not enough evidence for routine screening at age 11 or younger. A 2026 study adds early PHQ-9A evidence for ages 10 to 12. A child still needs a child-based tool, safety questions, and review of development, family, school, bullying, trauma, and health.

Teenagers age 12 to 18

US guidance supports screening when the service can diagnose, treat, and follow up. Use PHQ-A or the form chosen by the child-health service. Review anger, school, sleep, substances, family input, privacy, and suicide risk.

Adult women and men

A 2025 study supports comparing totals across sex and age groups. How a person shows distress can differ. Anger, pulling away, substance use, physical symptoms, stress, or hormone changes still deserve review.

Pregnancy and the first postpartum year

PHQ-9 can be used during pregnancy and after birth. EPDS is another tested form. Item 9 or another safety concern needs a same-day plan. Review bipolar signs, psychosis, unwanted harm thoughts, sleep, support, baby care, medicine, breastfeeding, pregnancy symptoms, and physical illness.

Adults age 65 and older

PHQ-9 is one option for older adults. Some services use GDS. Grief, pain, sleep, food, frailty, medicine, hearing, sight, reading, memory, brain disease, isolation, and lost function can change the answers and next check.

Chronic illness, disability, and access needs

Sleep, fatigue, food, movement, and focus can change because of depression, illness, treatment, disability, or several causes. Answer what you felt. Ask for a language and format you can use, then review mental and physical causes together.

03

How to complete PHQ-9 without losing the context

Check the form name. PHQ-9, PHQ-2, PHQ-8, and the teen PHQ-A are different forms. Save the form, language, place, and date.

Answer for the past 14 days. Use 0 for not at all, 1 for several days, 2 for more than half the days, and 3 for nearly every day.

Keep all nine answers. Sleep, energy, focus, movement, self-worth, and item 9 may change what needs help first.

Answer the separate difficulty question if it is on the form. It is not part of the 0 to 27 total. It shows how symptoms affected daily life.

Ask who will review item 9 and when. Any answer above 0 needs direct safety questions. Current intent, a plan, or being unable to stay safe needs urgent help.

Before the visit, note sleep, pain, food or weight changes, illness, pregnancy, recent birth, and periods or menopause. Add alcohol, drugs, nicotine, withdrawal, and medicine changes or side effects.

Tell your doctor about any clear period with little need for sleep, a very high or angry mood, or fast speech or thoughts. Also mention extra activity, risky acts, seeing or hearing things, or a bipolar diagnosis.

Do not stop medicine, suddenly stop a substance, lose sleep, skip meals, or repeat the form just to change the score.

01

Use the exact previous two weeks

Write the start and end dates, form, language, and setting. Keep those the same when you plan to compare a later score.

02

Score each item from 0 to 3

Use the printed frequency choices. Add the nine answers only after checking that every item is complete.

03

Save all nine answers with the total

The total can range from 0 to 27. Record which symptoms carried the score and which daily tasks changed.

04

Handle item 9 separately

Any response above 0 needs prompt direct safety questions. Immediate intent, a plan, inability to stay safe, or a life-threatening situation needs urgent help now.

05

Add function and possible look-alikes

Mention sleep, pain, illness, medicines, substances, pregnancy, postpartum timing, grief, trauma, anxiety, bipolar symptoms, psychosis, and physical-health signs.

06

Choose the next assessment, not a treatment from a number

A positive or rising score should lead to a clinical review, safety plan, and care choice based on the person, not an automatic prescription or diagnosis.

04

How to understand a PHQ-9 score

First check the form, two-week dates, missing answers, item 9, and immediate safety. Then review each symptom, daily difficulty, the total, other possible causes, and what comes next.

Incomplete, wrong form, or not comparable

You can't compare this score as usual. An item may be missing, or the form, language, time window, or way you completed it may have changed. Keep the answers and ask whether to repeat it.

0 to 4, minimal symptom band

Few symptoms happened often during these two weeks. Still report a crisis, safety concern, trauma, grief, bipolar signs, or a physical illness.

5 to 9, mild symptom band

Some symptoms were present. Review each answer, daily impact, changes over time, support, medicine, and possible physical causes.

10 to 14, moderate symptom band

A score of 10 is a common point for a full depression check. Bring every answer, daily impact, safety needs, the longer timeline, bipolar or psychosis history, medicine, substances, sleep, and physical health.

15 to 19, moderately severe symptom band

Arrange a timely review. Tell the clinician if symptoms are harming work, school, caregiving, food, sleep, driving, relationships, or self-care.

20 to 27, severe symptom band

Many symptoms happened often or nearly every day. Arrange a prompt check of safety, daily function, food, sleep, psychosis, mania, medicine, substances, and physical health.

Any total with item 9 or an immediate safety concern

Any item 9 answer above 0 needs prompt follow-up. Get urgent help if you have current intent, a plan, access to a method, or cannot stay safe. Danger from another person, psychosis, severe mania, or another life-threatening problem also needs urgent help.

Item 9 and safety are not score bands

Any item 9 answer above 0 needs direct safety questions. The item alone cannot grade risk. Current intent, a plan, inability to stay safe, psychosis, severe mania, abuse, or fast loss of basic care needs action now.

See research details

The research details explain scoring, repeat changes, item 9 limits, age, pregnancy, older adults, and crisis pathways.

SourceThe score is nine symptom frequencies from the previous two weeks ContextNIH describes PHQ-9 as a nine-item measure of depression symptoms over the past two weeks. Each answer scores 0 to 3 and the total runs from 0 to 27. The separate difficulty question describes impact and is not added to the total.

Keep every answer, total, date, language, setting, two-week dates, and the function response. Keep the total with the rest.

SourceThe original bands and cutoff came from primary and obstetric care ContextKroenke 2001 studied 6,000 patients in eight primary-care and seven obstetrics-gynecology clinics; 580 had an independent mental-health interview. A score of at least 10 had 88 percent sensitivity and 88 percent specificity, and scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 marked increasing symptom bands.

Use the bands to describe symptom burden and 10 as a common assessment prompt.

SourceUpdated accuracy data keep 10 useful but not definitive ContextNegeri 2021 obtained data from 100 of 127 eligible studies and 44,503 participants. Against semistructured interviews, the cutoff of 10 had pooled sensitivity 0.85 and specificity 0.85. Accuracy varied with the interview standard, age, and sex.

A result above 10 contains false positives and a result below 10 can miss depression. Use a clinical interview, function, safety, and the person's setting.

SourceA five-point change is a study anchor, not a universal recovery rule ContextLöwe 2004 followed 434 intervention participants from a late-life depression trial, 63 percent women with a mean age of 71. A five-point change was the estimated minimal clinically important difference in that study, and the scale tracked structured-interview outcomes over six months.

Compare the same form and conditions, then read the change beside function, safety, treatment timing, adverse effects, and clinical review. The published five-point change threshold is not a universal treatment target.

SourceTwo 2025 reviews support the total while showing real variation ContextChae 2025 reviewed 98 psychometric studies in 90 reports across 40 countries and found strong support for a one-factor summed score and measurement invariance across several demographic groups. Ajele 2025 pooled 60 studies and 232,147 participants, with internal consistency 0.86 and test-retest reliability 0.82, but heterogeneity was very high.

The total is useful, but language, setting, administration, culture, and why the form was used still belong with interpretation.

SourceA 2025 study raises a limit for repeated-score comparisons ContextHlynsson 2025 analyzed a clinical sample of 3,384 people. The study did not establish measurement invariance between treatment groups or convincingly across time and warned that part of a score change could reflect how people used the scale during treatment.

Pay attention to a repeated score, but one small change shouldn't outweigh item-level symptoms, function, safety, side effects, and the person's account of what changed.

SourceItem 9 is a follow-up signal, not a full suicide-risk assessment ContextNa 2018 compared item 9 with an electronic Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale in 841 patients. Item 9 was positive in 41.1 percent while the comparison risk measure was positive in 13.4 percent; sensitivity was 87.6 percent, specificity 66.1 percent, and positive predictive value 28.6 percent. Performance differed across groups.

Any response above 0 needs direct follow-up. Use a suicide-specific screen and a brief safety assessment to judge risk, not item 9 or the total. A 0 does not guarantee safety.

SourceAdolescents need their own form, setting, and safety pathway ContextRichardson 2010 studied 442 adolescents aged 13 to 17. A cutoff of 11 had sensitivity 89.5 percent and specificity 77.5 percent against a structured interview. USPSTF recommends depression screening from ages 12 to 18 only when diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up systems are in place.

Use PHQ-A or the pediatric service's chosen instrument, direct suicide screening, confidentiality, family and school context, and an age-appropriate assessment. Review any adult cutoff before using it.

SourceNew preteen evidence does not remove the need for pediatric review ContextStewart 2026 added validation evidence for PHQ-9A as a self-report screen in youth aged 10 to 12. US preventive guidance still says population-level screening evidence is insufficient at age 11 or younger, and NIMH says children younger than 8 need a full evaluation when suicide risk is suspected because no screening tool is validated for that age.

A pediatric assessment needs an age-appropriate tool. It should also cover development, communication, family and school context, physical illness, bullying, trauma, substance use, confidentiality, and safety.

SourcePregnancy and postpartum screening needs a response system ContextWang 2021 included 35 perinatal PHQ-9 studies. In seven criterion-validity studies, a cutoff of 10 had pooled sensitivity 0.84, specificity 0.81, and area under the curve 0.89. ACOG recommends validated screening at the initial prenatal visit, later in pregnancy, and postpartum with assessment, treatment, monitoring, and follow-up.

Keep bipolar symptoms, psychosis, item 9, intrusive harm thoughts, infant care, sleep, support, medicines, obstetric symptoms, and physical safety beside the score. Use the total only with these.

SourceOlder-adult cutoffs and symptoms can differ by setting ContextAslan 2020 studied 582 Chilean primary-care patients aged 65 to 80. Lower cutoffs increased sensitivity, while the tool had limited value for confirming possible cases. US preventive guidance includes adults aged 65 and older but also recognizes the Geriatric Depression Scale as another option.

Use hearing, vision, reading, cognition, grief, pain, sleep, medicines, frailty, appetite, neurological change, and function. Choose the tool and cutoff for the service and population.

SourceConcentration is one symptom, not an objective brain-fog test ContextHou 2025 studied 655 healthcare workers with PHQ-9 and a separate perceived-cognition questionnaire. Concentration and loss of interest were linked with perceived cognitive symptoms in a cross-sectional network, but the study did not establish diagnosis, causation, or objective cognitive impairment.

Use PHQ-9 to describe depression symptoms. Use history, sleep and medicine review, neurological assessment, and cognitive testing when the question is memory, attention, processing speed, head injury, or another cognitive cause.

SourceUS, UK, and Australian services can use different care pathways ContextUSPSTF uses 10 as a common adult screening point and requires further evaluation after a positive result. NICE uses 16 as one indicator separating less from more severe depression in its treatment guideline but says assessment must not rely only on symptom count. Australian guidance includes PHQ-9 while Healthdirect directs people to GP, therapy, medicines when appropriate, and local crisis support.

Keep the exact service, cutoff, function, safety plan, and follow-up. Countries use different cutoffs. None is your personal target, and none makes the score a diagnosis.

05

What you can do after a PHQ-9 result

You can use simple support before the full review is complete. Pick one small, safe thing to do that fits your energy.

Make one task smaller and scheduled

Choose one task, such as taking a shower, opening the curtains, eating breakfast, answering one message, or taking a short walk. Pick a time and make the first step small. Notice how you feel afterward.

Keep wake time and meals visible

Try to wake and eat at regular times when it is safe. Tell a clinician about vomiting, no food or drink, fast weight change, or several days with almost no sleep.

Use movement, daylight, and connection as support

A short safe walk, daylight, a simple activity, or time with someone you trust may help mood and sleep. Start below your physical limit if you have pain, dizziness, illness, pregnancy, or worse symptoms after effort.

Tell one person what help would be useful

Ask for clear help. For example, ask someone to sit with you while you call, bring food, or drive you to the visit. You could also ask them to check in tonight or hold your notes while you speak.

Review medicines, substances, and treatment choices

List alcohol, drugs, nicotine, pain medicine, steroids, hormone and thyroid medicine, mental-health medicine, supplements, missed doses, side effects, and withdrawal from the same two weeks. Bring the list to the prescriber. Do not stop treatment from the score. Ask which care options fit your health, pregnancy or breastfeeding, past response, and safety.

When direct care matters more

Call or text 988 in the US for suicidal thoughts or an emotional crisis, and call 911 for immediate danger or a life-threatening situation. UK readers can use NHS 111, a local crisis team, or 999 in immediate danger. Australian readers can call Lifeline 13 11 14 or 000 in immediate danger. Get urgent care for psychosis, severe mania, or being unable to eat or drink. You also need urgent care after several days with almost no sleep and a major change in behavior. Abuse, danger from another person, or being unable to manage basic care needs urgent assessment regardless of the total.

06

What to save from PHQ-9

Keep these together

  • Exact form, adult or adolescent version, language, setting, date, and the start and end of the 14-day window
  • All nine item answers, 0 to 27 total, published score band, missing items, and separate daily-difficulty response
  • Item 9 answer, who followed it up, direct suicide-specific screen if used, safety assessment, safety action, crisis contact, and follow-up owner
  • Sleep, energy, appetite, weight, concentration, movement, interest, mood, self-worth, work, school, caregiving, relationships, driving, and self-care
  • Mania or hypomania, psychosis, trauma, grief, anxiety, abuse, alcohol, cannabis, nicotine, other substances, medicines, missed doses, side effects, and withdrawal
  • Pain, illness, recovery from infection, anemia or iron, B12, thyroid, glucose, hormones, pregnancy or postpartum timing, head injury, neurological symptoms, the clinician's reading, the care choice, and the reason to repeat

Question for the visit

“Which answers matter most, what safety or diagnostic questions remain open, what physical contributors need review, and what support or treatment choice should happen next?”
07

Sources for PHQ-9 Depression Questionnaire

01
NIH, Patient Health Questionnaire 9, reviewed April 2026

Current instrument identity, two-week time window, available languages, research use, and copyright status.

02
USPSTF, Depression and Suicide Risk in Adults, 2023

US adult, pregnancy, postpartum, and older-adult screening, cutoff accuracy, follow-up, and screening-frequency limits.

03
USPSTF, Depression and Suicide Risk in Children and Adolescents, 2022

Ages 12 to 18 recommendation, age 11 and younger evidence gap, and need for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up systems.

04
NIMH, Ask Suicide-Screening Questions Toolkit

Youth and adult suicide-specific screening, brief safety assessment, age limits, and combined PHQ-9 or PHQ-A pathways.

05
NIMH, PHQ-9 Modified for Adolescents

Adolescent form, safety questions, and pediatric use context.

06
NIMH, Depression, revised 2025

Symptoms, cognition, medical look-alikes, diagnosis, treatment options, and crisis guidance.

07
NIMH, My Mental Health: Do I Need Help?, revised 2025

Function-first self-care, limits, professional help, and direct crisis action.

08
ACOG, Perinatal Mental Health Patient Screening

PHQ-9 and EPDS options, screening timing, scoring workflow, item 9 alert, and response planning.

09
ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline 4, 2023

Perinatal depression, bipolar, psychosis, suicide, intrusive-thought, and follow-up context.

10
NICE NG222, Depression in Adults

UK score context, full assessment, function, bipolar review, treatment choice, and the limit on symptom counts alone.

11
NICE CG192, Antenatal and Postnatal Mental Health

UK PHQ-9 or EPDS use as part of a full perinatal assessment and referral pathway.

12
NHS, How to Cope with Depression, reviewed 2026

Routine, meals, activity, support, talking therapies, medicine discussion, and UK urgent help.

13
Healthdirect Australia, Depression Support

Australian GP and therapy pathways, exercise, food, sleep, connection, medicine safety, Lifeline, and 000.

14
SAMHSA, Find Support

US support, treatment preparation, low-cost options, national helpline, and 988 access.

15
988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline

Current US call, text, and chat crisis support.

16
Kroenke et al., Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2001

Original 6,000-person validation, 580-person interview subset, scoring, bands, cutoff accuracy, and function.

17
Negeri et al., BMJ, 2021

Updated 44,503-participant individual-data meta-analysis, cutoff performance, interview-standard effects, age, and sex.

18
Löwe et al., Medical Care, 2004

Treatment responsiveness, older-adult trial population, repeat reliability, and the limited five-point change anchor.

19
Chae et al., Asian Nursing Research, 2025

Review of 98 psychometric studies, summed-score structure, reliability, and demographic measurement invariance.

20
Hlynsson et al., Psychiatric Quarterly, 2025

Historical review and clinical-sample challenge to between-group and across-time measurement invariance.

21
Ajele et al., Discover Mental Health, 2025

Sixty-study reliability meta-analysis, 232,147 participants, pooled reliability, and high heterogeneity.

22
Na et al., Journal of Affective Disorders, 2018

Item 9 comparison with C-SSRS in 841 patients and the limit on using it alone for suicide-risk assessment.

23
Wang et al., General Hospital Psychiatry, 2021

Thirty-five-study perinatal review, cutoff accuracy, EPDS comparison, and screening limits.

24
Richardson et al., Pediatrics, 2010

Adolescent validation in 442 youth aged 13 to 17, cutoff performance, function, and interview comparison.

25
Aslan et al., Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2020

Older Chilean primary-care validation, cutoff tradeoffs, and limited positive-screen utility.

26
Stewart et al., Journal of Affective Disorders, 2026

PHQ-9A validation evidence for youth aged 10 to 12 and the boundary around pediatric assessment.

27
Hou et al., Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2025

Cross-sectional depression and perceived-cognition network in 655 healthcare workers without objective-test or causal validation.

See each claim's sources

interpretation

An updated individual-participant-data meta-analysis with 44,503 participants found pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 at the common cutoff of 10 against semistructured interviews, with performance varying by reference standard and subgroup.

limitation

A five-point minimal important change estimate came from 434 participants in a late-life depression treatment trial and should not be used as a universal recovery target.

limitation

A 2025 study of 3,384 clinical participants did not establish measurement invariance between treatment groups or convincingly across time and warned against reading every score change as clinical change.

limitation

Older-adult validation shows useful screening performance but different cutoff tradeoffs and limited ability to confirm cases, so setting, cognition, physical health, and function remain necessary.